SCDF confused over Johnson’s statement | SOUALIGA NEWSDAY

SINT MAARTEN (PHILIPSBURG) – The St. Maarten Carnival Development Foundation (SCDF) on Wednesday said it did not know what to make of the statement by Minister of TEATT Stuart Johnson as most of his statement flies in the face of the law and creates the impression of wrong-doing by the foundation. SCDF also says the Minister’s statement also creates the impression that government funds Carnival in its entirety. “Both are far from the truth,” the foundation said.

The foundation said it respects the right of the Minister to share his opinions about Carnival, but it must clarify any impression created by the Minister regarding SCDF and financials. Moreover, the SCDF said the Minister could have met with the foundation prior to his press statement if he genuinely wanted to start working with the SCDF on preparing for Carnival. “We question the forces behind such a sudden statement,” the SCDF said.

The foundation explained that it receives an incidental subsidy of NAf 350,000 from government. To obtain this subsidy, the foundation and every other foundation that gets an incidental subsidy on St. Maarten, has to comply with the requirements outlined in the subsidy ordinance (in the law). It requires the SCDF to present a budget, financials signed off by a certified public accountant (CPA), and a plan of action for the requested funds.

Additionally, foundations getting an incidental subsidy have until March 1 of the year following for which the subsidy was received to submit its financials. The SCDF has submitted all of its 2018 documents to government, including certified financials, as it has done for the past decade. “If we had not done so, government would not be granting us any subsidy. Had government granted us subsidy without those documents, government would be acting against the law and this has not been the case,” President of the SCDF Alston Lourens explained.

Lourens also pointed out that while the Minister made specific mention about SCDF requesting subsidy with an increase for Carnival 2020, the Minister should be reminded that the early request for subsidy as well as any increase SCDF is seeking came at the behest of the head of the St. Maarten Tourist Bureau. Also, by the same subsidy ordinance, SCDF can request incidental subsidy anytime up to two months before the start of Carnival.

“So again, the foundation is not only acting within the law, but being prudent and doing so early to facilitate any discussions that must be had with government,” Lourens said, adding that a request for an increase in subsidy was also submitted for Carnival 50 and previous years. “People forget that the subsidy once stood at NAf 500,000 before being cut by government for reasons still unknown to the foundation. That increase came when the current Minister of TEATT was President of the SCDF and the increase was granted by then Minister Franklin Meyers. So to create the impression like it’s something new is totally disingenuous,” Lourens said. “We are so confident about our compliance when requesting subsidy, that we challenge any Minister, past or present, to dispute the fact that we have always complied with the law.”

Regarding an economic impact study for Carnival, Lourens questioned who conducts economic impact studies for any major economic influencer on St. Maarten. “Isn’t this government’s task? Government has produced several publications in which it clearly outlines how Carnival impacts the economy. These types of reports for the country should be commissioned and executed by government or government should contract an independent entity to do such. The Minister need only ask the STAT or Economic Affairs Department for guidance on this, both fall directly under him,” Lourens said.

He continued: “It also doesn’t take much for anyone to see and feel the economic impact Carnival had on St. Maarten for Carnival 2019. Compare the hotel occupancy now, to just two weeks ago. Call any hotel. Call the real estate agencies about their AirBnB properties. Compare the car rental agencies, supermarkets ect. Government’s economic surveys point out annually that Carnival creates significant economic activity for the country at a time when the slow season is just starting. The information is there. The Minister need only ask his own Ministry. Imagine, after 50 years of Carnival, the SCDF still has to prove the economic impact of St. Maarten’s largest and longest festival?”

Lourens said the SCDF will continue to comply with the law in all instances and will cooperate with government as it has been doing all along. However, Lourens stressed, government should be reminded that its subsidy makes up less than a third of Carnival’s total budget. The rest is funded by the foundation activities and contributions from the private sector.

“It has been quite easy for us to show how government’s portion is spent. The impression is created that government funds Carnival in its entirety. As we have shown before with facts and figures, St. Maarten Carnival is the least government-funded Carnival in the entire Caribbean region. The Minister with statements such as ‘people must know how the money is spent’ creates the impression that government funds Carnival totally and that SCDF never shows how money is spent,” Lourens said.

“Both are untruths. As pointed out before, if government didn’t know, government would not be granting subsidy. To put government’s subsidy into perspective, the Naf 350,000 is equaled to what SCDF pays for sound and security services alone. That’s to show how little that amount of money is in the bigger scope of a festival that carries a budget more than quadrupled that amount. Carnival is funded on the efforts of its volunteers and good graces and generosity of its corporate partners,” Lourens said.

As for the Minister’s statements on Calypso, booths and so on, Lourens said those are operational responsibilities of the SCDF which has been explained on numerous times publicly. He said the SCDF has its operational policies and keeps stakeholders up to date with these policies via several meetings which are publicized. “Again if the Minister wanted information about any issue that falls under the purview of the SCDF, not government, we are a simple email or phone call away,” Lourens said.

“We want to be very clear about the following. We have had multiple meetings with this Minister and Tourist Bureau since May of 2018. We have worked together on Uber Soca Cruise, we have presented a draft plan for marketing Carnival moving forward, we have even suffered early financial setbacks due to the fact that the Minister announced a Carnival pass giveaway without SCDF’s permission or that of the promoters, blunting early revenue by two months. We have records of all meetings, all decisions and all special requests from government that is not part of the subsidy ordinance. We therefor view the Minister’s press statement as disingenuous at best and maliciously influenced by outside forces at its worst.”

Source: Souliga Newsday’s-statement.html