PHILIPSBURG:— On March 9th, 2018 the Court in First Instance handled the injunction petition filed by 9 dismissed airport security workers. These workers were dismissed by the airport for the alleged looting of items from the Penha Store in October last year.
The workers through their Union demanded reinstatement but the airport maintained the dismissals even despite efforts through the Labor Department to have the matter settled. The workers were of the opinion that there was permission given and in any event, most of them still didn’t take anything. There was no proof of their involvement even though the airport claimed to have proof from video footage. The airport has been discriminatory in its decision to maintain their dismissal as others who were involved were not dismissed or allowed back to work.
The workers were thus forced to engage the legal services of their Attorney
Shaira Bommel (Sulvaran and Peterson law firm) who together with Attorney Cindy Marica – Henderson (Mariflex Attorneys) filed an injunction against the airport based on the unlawfulness of the dismissals.
The salaries from the date of their dismissal of the workers were claimed.
The airport on the other hand through its lawyer Femke Jansen (Lexwell) submitted a so-called conditional request for dissolution of the Labor contracts of the workers in as far as the Court might declare the dismissals unlawful. The basis for those conditional dissolution requests is that the airport no longer trusted the workers.
The Attorneys of the workers successfully refuted these grounds as this again showed the discrimination at the airport, how could the airport lose trust in these workers and the others that were allowed not? Most of the dismissed workers have a clean slate and have been loyal workers for over 15 years. Some even have over 25 years of loyal and dedicated service.
There was absolutely no proof of the looting by the workers. The video footage didn’t show anything. Even the ones shown during the handling of the cases didn’t show anything. Moreover, the airport has withdrawn one of the dismissals after they reviewed the video footage and concluded that the worker involved was not in the video. Why did the airport not review all the other allegedly available footage the attorneys claimed?
Another fact showing the inappropriate manner in which the airport acted, is the fact that workers were not allowed to record the questioning by the head of security. There were no reports of the questioning of the workers and this no proof of what they stated, which remains for the airport’s account.
The Court in its rulings of this morning agreed with the arguments of the workers’ s lawyers and agreed that the dismissals could be deemed unlawful and justifiably nullified. The judge also questioned and disapproved the manner in which the so-called investigation took place into the accusations against the workers. It was evident that somewhere there was permission given to take the remaining damaged goods out of the store. This rumored and that’s why a big group of workers went ahead and got items. The fact that the workers returned items and/or offered to return the items when they learned that there might not have been permission to take the items out of the store clearly shows that there was no intention to loot but merely some miscommunication.
The judge agreed with the workers that the airport acted at will and didn’t treat The involved workers equally. The workers have a very long work relationship and have dedicated their years to the airport and as such have a justified interest in maintaining their jobs.
The Court awarded the workers their salaries from November 2017 increased with legal interests and late payment increase of 10%. The salaries must be paid until the date the labor agreement is legally dissolved.
The conditional dissolution requests of the airport were denied. The Court condemned the manner in which the airport handled their investigation. There is no urgent reason for a dissolution nor has the airport successfully proven that they had justified reasons for losing trust in the workers. The Court also took into account the long duration of the Labor agreements of the workers.
The airport must pay the legal fees of the Attorneys of the workers up to the tune of Nafl 1000 in each of the cases.
The workers are extremely happy that justice has been served and are looking forward to returning back to work.
Click here to view the Court’s verdict.
Source: St. Martin News Network http://www.smn-news.com/st-maarten-st-martin-news/28853-dismissed-airport-security-workers-successfully-contested-their-dismissal-in-court.html
View comments
Hide comments